lightblue-ldap: Using unboundid-ldapsdk "Standard Edition"
For the ldap implementation, I have been using unboundid as the ldap client. With it, I now have a simple insert and search working. At this point, I want to make sure no one has issue with this library selection. The primary reasons I chose this library is for ease of use and it has built in support for an in-memory ldap server for testing.
Re: lightblue-ldap: Using unboundid-ldapsdk "Standard Edition"
I don't know the library (or any ldap libraries) but the licences for this one are OK for use with GPLv3 and therefore we can use it with lightblue. Is there a specific concern with this library that you need feedback on or is it a general preference question?